Just make sure to consult the sizing guide to get the right size. As a result, it conforms to fit around the waist like a perfect fit. The Zipster Lite also feels less heavy than the original Nathan Zipster Belt, which weighs just over an ounce. The FlipBelt always felt light on, but it suddenly feels much heavier even in hand compared to the Zipster Lite. When putting the Zipster Lite against the FlipBelt, there is a clear winner when it comes to its weight. Photo: Lauren Keating How The Running Belts Compare: Design, Function, And Features
So to my delight, I found that Nathan’s Zipster Lite also didn’t bounce, but that was just the start of the many pleasant surprises I uncovered during my runs while using it. This is something the FlipBelt doesn’t do, which was a major reason why so many people purchase the product. The problem with many is that they “bounce” during the run, sliding up from the hips. Worn around the waist, there is typically a slot for money, keys, a phone and sports nutrition. It allows the runner to be hands-free while storing goods. These are designed essentially to be pockets for the runner.
Photo: Lauren Keatingīefore even discussing the product, it’s important to know the importance of running belts in general. These two things combined made it my gear go-to when getting in some quick miles. While being lightweight is its main selling feature, the amount of storage space is another attractive feature. Just like its name suggests, this is one ultra-light running belt that goes unnoticed throughout the run. That is until I started running with the Nathan Zipster Lite. Like many runners out there, this runner was a FlipBelt user.
0 kommentar(er)
